How much this matters at over 200 fps will be for you to decide, at least for this particular title, but it does indicate that when more CPU limited, the 7800X3D can boost gaming performance quite dramatically. But at 1080p, the 7800X3D was 22% faster when comparing the average frame rate and 31% faster for the 1% lows. The 7800X3D managed a small 7% win at 1080p, but the 1440p and 4K results were basically identical.į1 22 is another game that sees mostly comparable performance for example, the 1440p and 4K numbers are extremely similar, and in some instances, such as 4K, they're the same. The performance in Total War: Warhammer III is also much the same using either CPU. Moving on to Halo Infinite, we find that either CPU is more than capable of powering the RTX 4090 through this title, with over 200 fps seen at 1080p and around 200 fps at 1440p. However, this margin was reduced to just 6% at the more GPU-limited 1440p resolution, and then essentially nothing at 4K. Both CPUs allowed for impressive frame rates at 1080p, but the 7800X3D was 27% faster averaging 192 fps. Star Wars Jedi: Survivor is a famously CPU-limited title, but it has seen a few patches since release and we tested with the latest version of the game. The margin was reduced to just 7% at 1440p or 15% when looking at the 1% lows, but the performance here is quite similar overall, with little to no performance difference at 4K. This wasn't the case in The Last of Us Part I, where the 7800X3D was 27% faster than the 5800X3D at 1080p, although it must be said that both CPUs delivered highly playable performance. Regardless, this allowed for over 300 fps at 1080p, and both the 5800X3D and 7800X3D produced virtually identical results.Įven with hardware ray tracing enabled, CPU performance remained very similar with no noticeable difference between these two 3D V-Cache parts. Moving on to Fortnite, which we tested using the epic quality settings (although this probably isn't how competitive gamers will play the game). The 7800X3D was just 9% faster at 1080p and 1440p, with virtually identical performance at 4K.Īs expected, enabling ray tracing did reduce frame rates, but the margins between these two AMD CPUs remained similar, with the 7800X3D outperforming by a 10% margin at 1080p, 11% at 1440p and surprisingly 12% at 4K with a massive 24% improvement for the 1% lows here. Next, we have Marvel's Spider-Man Remastered, and this game plays very well using either CPU, with well over 200 fps on average at 1080p and 1440p, regardless of the CPU used. So for those with higher-end GPUs hoping to play Hogwarts Legacy with ray tracing enabled, the 7800X3D will offer a noticeable performance boost over the 5800X3D in this title. The added CPU load required to run RT effects shows that the 7800X3D maintains its lead, delivering almost 40% more performance at 1080p and 36% more at 1440p.Įven at 4K, the newer 3D V-Cache part is offering a rather handy 15% performance advantage. Now with ray tracing enabled, the frame rates come well down, but whereas you might have expected performance to now be heavily GPU limited, that's not the case. The margin is reduced at 4K, but even so, the 7800X3D was still 2% faster here or 15% faster if we compare 1% lows. That said, the newer 3D V-cache CPU was 38-41% faster when comparing the average frame rate at these resolutions. Here, we find that the game is heavily CPU limited at both 1080p and 1440p, even with the 7800X3D. So let's get into it… Benchmarksįirst up, we have Hogwarts Legacy using the ultra-quality preset, but with ray tracing disabled, though we will look at some RT results in a moment. Then for the graphics card, we have the Asus ROG Strix RTX 4090 OC Edition graphics card, which has been benchmarked at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Meanwhile, the 7800X3D was installed on the Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master using the latest F11c BIOS revision. Then for those without an existing AM4 system looking at building a new PC, should they go with the more affordable option in the 5800X3D and its supporting platform, or go all out with the 7800X3D? Today's review plans to answer both of these questions and more.įor testing, the 5800X3D was used on the MSI MPG X570S Carbon Max WiFi motherboard with G.Skill's DDR4-3600 CL14 32GB memory. The question now is, for those still on AM4 and in need of more CPU power, should they purchase the 5800X3D, allowing them to breathe new life into their existing system, or start over with a new platform sporting a shiny new 7800X3D? It wasn't reliant on premium memory for optimum performance and, best of all, it could be slotted into existing AM4 motherboards, making it an easy and affordable upgrade for many. The 5800X3D was a hugely successful CPU as it offered premium gaming performance at an affordable price, was power-efficient, and thus easy to cool. Today, we're comparing the new Ryzen 7 7800X3D head-to-head with the previous generation's 3D V-Cache part, the 5800X3D.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |